> The first log statement is expected. The second log statement, however, isn't.
> The total table size is (as noted earlier) about 5GB and, in fact, fit
> into one nice hash table (approx 15GB in size).
> Is the sorting that is necessary for index creation unable to use a
> hash table? (This is a standard btree index).
How big is the source table? You're not sorting the *result* table,
you're sorting the source table if you're summarizing it.
If the original source data is only 5GB, I'd check your code for a
cartesian join.
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com
