Re: The flinfo->fn_extra question, from me this time. - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Dent John
Subject Re: The flinfo->fn_extra question, from me this time.
Date
Msg-id F8E6F876-FDFA-42A8-BF55-09E6FD56D9F4@QQdd.eu
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: The flinfo->fn_extra question, from me this time.  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: The flinfo->fn_extra question, from me this time.  (Dent John <denty@QQdd.eu>)
List pgsql-hackers
> On 3 Nov 2019, at 13:33, Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> can be nice, if patch has some regress tests - it is good for memory refreshing what is target of patch.

With a suitably small work_mem constraint, it is possible to show the absence of buffers resulting from the tuplestore.
It’llneed some commentary explaining what is being looked for, and why. But it’s a good idea. 

I’ll take a look.

denty.


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: The flinfo->fn_extra question, from me this time.
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] contrib/seg: Fix PG_GETARG_SEG_P definition