>See how buffers_backend is much larger than buffers_clean, even though maxwritten_clean is low? That means the
backgroundwriter isn't running often enough to keep up with cleaning things, even though >it does a lot of work when it
doeskick in. In your situation I'd normally do a first pass by cutting bgwriter_lru_maxpages to 1/4 of what it is now,
cutbgwriter_delay to 1/4 as well (to 50ms), and >then see how the proportions change. You can probably cut the
multiplier,too, yet still see more pages written by the cleaner.
>I recommend saving a snapsot of this data with a timestamp, i.e.:
>select now(),* from pg_stat_bgwriter;
>Anytime you make a change to one of the background writer or checkpoint timing parameters. That way you have a new
baselineto compare against. These numbers aren't very useful with a single value, >but once you get two of them with
timestampsyou can compute all sorts of fun statistics from the pair.
So, if I understand correctly, I should strive for a relative increase in buffers_clean to buffers_backend
