RE: [HACKERS] shmem limits and redolog - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jackson, DeJuan
Subject RE: [HACKERS] shmem limits and redolog
Date
Msg-id F10BB1FAF801D111829B0060971D839F4FEB5F@cpsmail
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: [HACKERS] shmem limits and redolog
List pgsql-hackers
>     What do the others say?
> 
In my opinion a redo log is more than worth the overhead.  If it is
possible to keep those databases that aren't using the log from creating
the shmem and semaphores until logging is turned on for them, I'd say
you'd eliminated all of the possible arguments.-DEJ


> Jan
> 
> 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
Date:
Subject: shmem limits and redolog
Next
From: Michael Meskes
Date:
Subject: lo_import problem