Re: MOVE LAST: why? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Hiroshi Inoue
Subject Re: MOVE LAST: why?
Date
Msg-id EKEJJICOHDIEMGPNIFIJKEBGKFAA.Inoue@tpf.co.jp
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: MOVE LAST: why?  (Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue@tpf.co.jp>)
Responses Re: MOVE LAST: why?
List pgsql-hackers
> Honestly I'm not so enthusiastic about scrollable cursors.
> Even though PostgreSQL provides an efficient scrollable
> cursor, I would use it little unless it could survive
> across transactions.
> 
> Anyway it's too bad that FETCH LAST means FETCH ALL.

I would remove LAST, RELATIVE and SCROLL keywords
for cursor related operations if there's no objection.

regards, 
Hiroshi Inoue


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Roadmap for 7.4
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: default to WITHOUT OIDS?