Re: MOVE LAST: why? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: MOVE LAST: why?
Date
Msg-id 200301121628.h0CGS9T17109@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: MOVE LAST: why?  ("Hiroshi Inoue" <Inoue@tpf.co.jp>)
List pgsql-hackers
Hiroshi Inoue wrote:
> > Honestly I'm not so enthusiastic about scrollable cursors.
> > Even though PostgreSQL provides an efficient scrollable
> > cursor, I would use it little unless it could survive
> > across transactions.
> > 
> > Anyway it's too bad that FETCH LAST means FETCH ALL.
> 
> I would remove LAST, RELATIVE and SCROLL keywords
> for cursor related operations if there's no objection.

Are you suggesting removing FETCH LAST _and_ MOVE LAST?.  I think MOVE
LAST works well.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
359-1001+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: default to WITHOUT OIDS?
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: A modest proposal for a FAQ addition