On Oct 16, 2014, at 12:14 AM, Devrim Gündüz <devrim@gunduz.org> wrote:
We cannot push 2.1 to 9.2 without changing the name of the packaging. If we just update to 2.1 on 9.2, then 2.0 users will be unhappy. Instead, we can bite the bullet and create something like
postgis_20_92 (for 2.0) postgis_21_92 (for 2.1)
so that they can be installed in parallel. Jeff/Craig, comments?
The naming seems fine to me and then we can have the new package name deprecate the old one.
