Re: 8.5 vs. 9.0, Postgres vs. PostgreSQL - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David E. Wheeler
Subject Re: 8.5 vs. 9.0, Postgres vs. PostgreSQL
Date
Msg-id EE2F6D7D-30D8-46CC-8564-2BFA898E9003@kineticode.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: 8.5 vs. 9.0, Postgres vs. PostgreSQL  (Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu>)
Responses Re: 8.5 vs. 9.0, Postgres vs. PostgreSQL
List pgsql-hackers
On Jan 23, 2010, at 3:25 AM, Greg Stark wrote:

> Actually the original promounciation was mee-ess-cue-ell, "My" is
> monty's daughter's name and is pronounced like that. People generally
> pronounced it "my" though so they just made that the official
> pronounciation -- but they still don't approve of "my-sequel".

We could go with "PrySQL," as in you can pry it from my cold dead fingers. Or if you're Finnish, you can think of it as
comingbefore SQL. 

Or maybe "TrySQL", to encourage you to try it and because you can make tress out of it. It's greener, too.

Or perhaps OMGWTFSQL. No, wait, sorry, that's what I say when I'm working with MySQL.

How about "PugSQL"? It's kind of butch, keeps the "pg" part, and we could have a dog logo.

Or maybe we can determine that geeks are completely useless at branding and not touch this issue with a 10m pole.

So, 10mPoleSQL it is. Or maybe KillThisFuckingThreadSQL. Rather suggestive, don't you think?

Best,

David

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "David E. Wheeler"
Date:
Subject: Re: Miscellaneous changes to plperl [PATCH]
Next
From: Bernd Helmle
Date:
Subject: Re: [BUG?] strange behavior in ALTER TABLE ... RENAME TO on inherited columns