On Apr 6, 2010, at 5:23 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> It has been suggested in the past that we should have a full DBD interface in plperl, and indeed there was such an
animalat one stage, although it was not compatibly licensed, and it is probably now way out of date.
>
> The current plperl interface back into the database is a *much* thinner veneer over SPI than a DBD interface would
be.Someone could start a project for a DBD interface for plperl, but it would be a non-trivial amount of work, and it
shouldprobably not be done piecemeal.
That would be great, but my current need is far simpler than that.
Best,
David