Re: psqlODBC 8.01.0106 Development snapshot - Mailing list pgsql-odbc

From Dave Page
Subject Re: psqlODBC 8.01.0106 Development snapshot
Date
Msg-id E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E4E7EDA3@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk
Whole thread Raw
In response to psqlODBC 8.01.0106 Development snapshot  (Ludek Finstrle <luf@pzkagis.cz>)
Responses Re: psqlODBC 8.01.0106 Development snapshot  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Re: psqlODBC 8.01.0106 Development snapshot  (Ludek Finstrle <luf@pzkagis.cz>)
List pgsql-odbc

> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgsql-odbc-owner@postgresql.org
> [mailto:pgsql-odbc-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Peter Eisentraut
> Sent: 05 January 2006 10:52
> To: pgsql-odbc@postgresql.org
> Cc: Ludek Finstrle
> Subject: Re: [ODBC] psqlODBC 8.01.0106 Development snapshot
>
> Am Samstag, 24. Dezember 2005 12:06 schrieb Ludek Finstrle:
> >   I announce new development snapshot. It's a small gift for you ;-)
> > Snapshot informations:
> >
> > Release Name: psqlodbc 8.01.0106
>
> Why has the version number changed from 08.01.xxxx to 8.01.xxxx?

Typo?

> Where is the CVS tag for the release?

It a snapshot, not a release, and contains patches that are not yet
committed for users to test. Most psqlODBC users cannot compile it
themselves so test builds are produced for them.

> Why is the source tarball not bootstrapped for Unix builds?

Pass.

> Doesn't Dave have a release building procedure that you or
> anyone else could
> use?

Nope. It's that simple I never really even considered writing one. And
wouldn't apply to a dev snapshot anyway.

Regards, Dave.


pgsql-odbc by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: psqlODBC 8.01.0106 Development snapshot
Next
From:
Date:
Subject: [ psqlodbc-Bugs-1000519 ] Does not pick up default username