Re: Schema bug - Mailing list pgadmin-hackers

From Dave Page
Subject Re: Schema bug
Date
Msg-id E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E4E7E96D@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk
Whole thread Raw
In response to Schema bug  (Guillaume LELARGE <gleu@wanadoo.fr>)
Responses Re: Schema bug
List pgadmin-hackers

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andreas Pflug [mailto:pgadmin@pse-consulting.de]
> Sent: 14 December 2005 10:27
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: Guillaume LELARGE; pgadmin-hackers@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Schema bug
>
> > I don't have a problem with that. Anyone else?
>
> I *do* have a problem if information_schema becomes non-system.  For
> pgsql-core this is non-system, but a user would consider this
> system and
> like to have its display suppressed for day-to-day work.

Yeah, well, apart from that bit.

> I'm still not convinced we need to do anything. Renaming public is
> highly irregular, and finally showing system objects will make it
> reappear. The schema restriction allows individual filters
> who likes it.

Renaming public is irregular, but if we can allow it without breaking
anything else, then I see no reason why we shouldn't do it.

/D

pgadmin-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andreas Pflug
Date:
Subject: Re: Schema bug
Next
From: Andreas Pflug
Date:
Subject: Re: Schema bug