Re: pg_proc.h - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Dave Page
Subject Re: pg_proc.h
Date
Msg-id E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E4E7DF2C@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk
Whole thread Raw
In response to pg_proc.h  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Responses Re: pg_proc.h  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers

> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org
> [mailto:pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of
> Andrew Dunstan
> Sent: 10 November 2005 14:30
> To: PostgreSQL-development
> Subject: [HACKERS] pg_proc.h
>
>
> contains the following:
>
> /* ----------------
>  *      initial contents of pg_proc
>  * ----------------
>  */
>
> /* keep the following ordered by OID so that later changes
> can be made
> easier */
>
>
> which has manifestly not been followed. Should we fix the
> file or remove
> the second comment?

I vote for fixing the file (but then I'm not doing the work).
Unused_oids or whatevers it's called is fine, but it's still handy to be
able to read the file easily.

Regards, Dave


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: pg_proc.h
Next
From: "Merlin Moncure"
Date:
Subject: win32 8.1 pgadmin dll issues