Re: Which processor runs better for Postgresql? - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Dave Page
Subject Re: Which processor runs better for Postgresql?
Date
Msg-id E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E401388955@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk
Whole thread Raw
In response to Which processor runs better for Postgresql?  (Steve Poe <steve.poe@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-performance

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Scott Marlowe [mailto:smarlowe@g2switchworks.com]
> Sent: 14 June 2006 20:52
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: Joshua D. Drake; steve.poe@gmail.com;
> pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
> Subject: RE: [PERFORM] Which processor runs better for Postgresql?
>
>
> Yeah, We've got a mix of 2650 and 2850s, and our 2850s have been rock
> solid stable, unlike the 2650s.  I was actually kinda surprised to see
> how many people have problems with the 2850s.
>
> Apparently, the 2850 mobos have a built in RAID that's pretty stable
> (it's got a PERC number I can't remembeR), but ordering them
> with an add
> on Perc RAID controller appears to make them somewhat
> unstable as well.

That might be it - we always chose the onboard PERC because it has twice
the cache of the other options.

Regards, Dave.

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Scott Marlowe
Date:
Subject: Re: Which processor runs better for Postgresql?
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Postgres consuming way too much memory???