Re: Which processor runs better for Postgresql? - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Dave Page
Subject Re: Which processor runs better for Postgresql?
Date
Msg-id E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E401388954@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk
Whole thread Raw
In response to Which processor runs better for Postgresql?  (Steve Poe <steve.poe@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Which processor runs better for Postgresql?
List pgsql-performance
 


From: Scott Marlowe [mailto:smarlowe@g2switchworks.com]
Sent: 14 June 2006 18:04
To: Dave Page
Cc: Joshua D. Drake; steve.poe@gmail.com; pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: RE: [PERFORM] Which processor runs better for Postgresql?

On Tue, 2006-06-13 at 15:11, Dave Page wrote:

> > -----Original Message-----

> And how old are the 2600's now?
>
> Anyhoo, I'm not saying the current machines are excellent performers or
> anything, but there are good business reasons to run them if you don't
> need to squeeze out every last pony.

Just thought I'd point you to Dell's forums.

http://forums.us.dell.com/supportforums/board?board.id=pes_linux&page=1

wherein you'll find plenty of folks who have problems with freezing RAID
controllers with 28xx and 18xx machines. 
 

<shrug>Never had any such problems in the dozen or so machines we run (about a 50-50 split of Linux to Windows). 

Regards, Dave

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: "John Vincent"
Date:
Subject: Re: Performance of pg_dump on PGSQL 8.0
Next
From: Antoine
Date:
Subject: Re: OT - select + must have from - sql standard syntax?