Re: Promoting the enhanced branch - Mailing list pgsql-odbc

From Dave Page
Subject Re: Promoting the enhanced branch
Date
Msg-id E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E4011C9B8C@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk
Whole thread Raw
In response to Promoting the enhanced branch  ("Dave Page" <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>)
Responses Re: Promoting the enhanced branch  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-odbc

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Peter Eisentraut [mailto:peter_e@gmx.net]
> Sent: 10 April 2006 12:50
> To: pgsql-odbc@postgresql.org
> Cc: Dave Page
> Subject: Re: [ODBC] Promoting the enhanced branch
>
> Am Samstag, 8. April 2006 21:01 schrieb Dave Page:
> > 7) Updated all libnames to psqlodbc35w.(so|lib|dylib|whatever).
>
> What is that supposed to accomplish?  If we're dropping the
> Unicode/ANSI dichotomy, I'd rather go back to plain
> psqlodbc.so for the Unix builds.  I'm not sure about the
> exact implications on Windows.  But in general I think this
> will just annoy people if they have to change their
> configurations for no apparent reason.

Consistency with the actual ODBC version supported - it was
psqlodbc30w.so
(http://cvs.pgfoundry.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/psqlodbc/psqlodbc/Makefile.
am?rev=1.11.2.4&content-type=text/x-cvsweb-markup&only_with_tag=REL-07_0
3_ENHANCED) which is clearly wrong if the default build is for ODBC
3.51.

I have no objection if you want to change it to psqlodbc.so though. On
Windows it's a non-issue, though personally I would prefer it to be
psqlodbc.dll. I'd also like to drop the naming variations in psqlodbc.h,
but I'm wary of being too hasty to do that.

Regards, Dave.

pgsql-odbc by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Promoting the enhanced branch
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Promoting the enhanced branch