Re: Future versions of psqlODBC - Mailing list pgsql-odbc

From Dave Page
Subject Re: Future versions of psqlODBC
Date
Msg-id E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E4011C96DA@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk
Whole thread Raw
In response to Future versions of psqlODBC  ("Dave Page" <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>)
Responses Re: Future versions of psqlODBC
Re: Future versions of psqlODBC
List pgsql-odbc

> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgsql-odbc-owner@postgresql.org
> [mailto:pgsql-odbc-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Ludek Finstrle
> Sent: 22 March 2006 11:58
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: pgsql-odbc@postgresql.org; Ludek Finstrle;
> anoopk@pervasive-postgres.com; Hiroshi Inoue; Hiroshi Saito
> Subject: Re: [ODBC] Future versions of psqlODBC
>
> > I therefore propose the following:
> >
> > 1) The current CVS code is branched into a
> REL-08_01_PATCHES branch to
> > be used for bug fixes.
>
> Sure.
>
> > 2) The REL-07_03_ENHANCED branch is merged into CVS tip, whilst
> > maintaing the current installer and documentation etc.
>
> Sure.
>
> > 3) The driver is rebranded to
> > PostgreSQL+/psqlodbcplus.so/psqlodbcplus.lib to
> differentiate it from
> > all previous versions.
>
> I disagree. If I remember it right there was psqlodbcplus already.
> Why confuse users more? Why we need the differentiation? The driver
> is based on 7.3 version ...

Well, either way it will be different from 08.01 because there is only
one driver in the 7.3E branch, so there is no ANSI/Unicode distinction.

As for the name, yes, there was a psqlodbcplus, but I thought they never
actually released anything. On double checking that's not the case so
that isn't such a good name as you say.

We could just return to plain old psqlodbc/PostgreSQL ?

Regards, Dave.

pgsql-odbc by date:

Previous
From: Bart Samwel
Date:
Subject: Re: Most recent driver aborts transaction after one error
Next
From: Bart Samwel
Date:
Subject: Re: Future development