Re: Comment on timezone and interval types - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Michael Glaesemann
Subject Re: Comment on timezone and interval types
Date
Msg-id E707A05E-27F8-11D9-A3CC-000A95C88220@myrealbox.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Comment on timezone and interval types  (Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org>)
Responses Re: Comment on timezone and interval types  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-general
On Oct 27, 2004, at 6:00 PM, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:

> On Wed, Oct 27, 2004 at 09:21:39AM +0200, Thomas Hallgren wrote:
>>
>> Using OID's is a good idea, but I think a canonical list of known
>> timezone to OID mappings must be maintained and shipped with the
>> PostgreSQL core.
>
> How can there be a "canonical list of known timezones" if every
> operating system has it's own list. Maybe you can provide a base list,
> but you have to allow for people to make their own.

My understanding is that with the addition of the zic time zone data to
the PostgreSQL server, there's no longer any need to rely on OS time
zone data. Some areas may still use OS time zone data--I'm not sure if
the all the niggling pieces have been converted yet. One could then
produce a canonical list, based on the zic data.

Corrections welcome if I've misunderstood something.

Regards,

Michael Glaesemann
grzm myrealbox com


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Richard Huxton
Date:
Subject: Re:
Next
From: "Marco Ferretti"
Date:
Subject: Re: Comment on timezone and interval types