Re: Cannot read block error. - Mailing list pgsql-hackers
From | Jason Essington |
---|---|
Subject | Re: Cannot read block error. |
Date | |
Msg-id | E39B5EDB-5F52-11D8-A43D-0003930C67DA@GreenRiverComputing.com Whole thread Raw |
In response to | Re: Cannot read block error. ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>) |
List | pgsql-hackers |
Starting in single user mode and reindexing the database didn't fix the error, although it seemed to run just fine. Vacuum verbose ran until it hit the tfxtrade_details table and then it died with that same error. it didn't whine about any other problems prior to dying. INFO: --Relation public.tfxtrade_details-- ERROR: cannot read block 176 of tfxtrade_details: Numerical result out of range Guess there is just something really munged in this one. I'll just try to restore it from the backup. Interesting, when I went to copy my data directory out of the way, I received this from cp: cp: data/base/16976/17840: Result too large might be a clue -jason On Feb 14, 2004, at 5:01 PM, Joshua D. Drake wrote: > Hello, > > There are a couple of things it could be. I would suggest that you take > down the database, start it up with -P? (I think it is -o '-P' it might > be -p '-O' I don't recall) and try and reindex the database itself. > > You can also do a vacuuum verbose and see if you get some more errors > you > may have a corrupt system index that needs to be reindexed. > > Sincerely, > > Johsua D. Drake > > > On Sat, 14 Feb 2004, Jason Essington wrote: > >> Both vacuum [full] and reindex fail with that same error. >> >> vacuum is run regularly via a cron job. >> >> -jason >> On Feb 14, 2004, at 2:29 PM, Joshua D. Drake wrote: >> >>> Hello, >>> >>> When was the last time you ran a reindex? Or a vacuum / vacuum full? >>> >>> Sincerely, >>> >>> Joshua D. Drake >>> >>> On Sat, 14 Feb 2004, Jason Essington wrote: >>> >>>> I am running PostgreSQL 7.3.3 on OS X Server 10.2 >>>> >>>> The database has been running just fine for quite some time now, but >>>> this morning it began pitching the error: >>>> ERROR: cannot read block 176 of tfxtrade_details: Numerical result >>>> out of range >>>> any time the table tfxtrade_details is accessed. >>>> >>>> A description of the table is at the end of this email >>>> >>>> I have a backup from last night, so I haven't lost much data (if >>>> any), >>>> but I am curious if there is a way to recover from this (beyond >>>> restoring from backup) and how I would go about figuring out what >>>> caused it to prevent it from happening again. >>>> >>>> I will keep a copy of the data directory if anyone wants me to do >>>> any >>>> analysis on it (I will need instructions). >>>> >>>> Any insights would be appreciated. >>>> >>>> Thanks >>>> >>>> Jason Essington >>>> jaessing@greenrivercomputing.com >>>> >>>> >>>> hedgehog=# \d tfxtrade_details >>>> Table "public.tfxtrade_details" >>>> Column | Type | Modifiers >>>> ---------------+--------------------------+----------- >>>> rid | integer | not null >>>> clientid | integer | >>>> tradeid | integer | >>>> rollid | integer | >>>> rollpct | numeric(10,8) | >>>> expdetailid | integer | >>>> expid | integer | >>>> contractpct | numeric(10,8) | >>>> contractamt | numeric(18,2) | >>>> origpct | numeric(10,8) | >>>> origamt | numeric(18,2) | >>>> acctgperiod | integer | >>>> acctgperiodid | integer | >>>> editdate | timestamp with time zone | >>>> edituserid | character varying(48) | >>>> parentid | integer | >>>> entityid | integer | >>>> tradedate | date | >>>> maturitydate | date | >>>> strategyid | integer | >>>> currencyid | integer | >>>> Indexes: tfxtrade_details_pkey primary key btree (rid), >>>> tfxlinks_entityid_index btree (entityid), >>>> tfxlinks_expdetailid_index btree (expdetailid), >>>> tfxlinks_expid_index btree (expid), >>>> tfxlinks_mdate_index btree (maturitydate), >>>> tfxlinks_parentid_index btree (parentid), >>>> tfxlinks_strategy_index btree (strategyid), >>>> tfxlinks_tradeid_index btree (tradeid) >>>> Triggers: RI_ConstraintTrigger_30891, >>>> RI_ConstraintTrigger_30894, >>>> tfxdetail_delete_trigger >>>> >>>> >>>> ---------------------------(end of >>>> broadcast)--------------------------- >>>> TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? >>>> >>>> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html >>>> >>> >>> -- >>> Co-Founder >>> Command Prompt, Inc. >>> The wheel's spinning but the hamster's dead >>> >> >> >> ---------------------------(end of >> broadcast)--------------------------- >> TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster >> > > -- > Co-Founder > Command Prompt, Inc. > The wheel's spinning but the hamster's dead >
pgsql-hackers by date: