On 10-Jun-07, at 11:11 PM, Jim Nasby wrote:
> On Jun 8, 2007, at 11:31 AM, Dave Cramer wrote:
>> Is it possible that providing 128G of ram is too much ? Will other
>> systems in the server bottleneck ?
>
> Providing to what? PostgreSQL? The OS? My bet is that you'll run
> into issues with how shared_buffers are managed if you actually try
> and set them to anything remotely close to 128GB.
Well, we'd give 25% of it to postgres, and the rest to the OS.
What is it specifically you are referring to ?
Dave
> --
> Jim Nasby jim@nasby.net
> EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com 512.569.9461 (cell)
>
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of
> broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org