-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
- --On Friday, November 16, 2007 00:40:31 -0500 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
wrote:
> "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org> writes:
>> - --On Friday, November 16, 2007 00:03:46 -0500 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
>> wrote:
>>> Either that or we try to move up all supported back branches to the
>>> latest autoconf version; which might be a good idea but it scares me
>>> a bit.
>
>> That would be a good idea, and really simply things ... FreeBSD seems to have
>> drop'd off support for all but 2.13 and 2.61 ...
>
> Perhaps so, but it'd cost us a fair amount of up-front work to verify
> that we don't break the back branches by updating their configure
> scripts. Not something I want to touch on a last-minute basis ;-)
Wasn't suggesting 'last-minute', but maybe post 8.3 release, while things are a
bit quiet?
- ----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email . scrappy@hub.org MSN . scrappy@hub.org
Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQFHPS7E4QvfyHIvDvMRAvgVAKDZ4OlC6dcwIeTu4APXYTfQ6XArlwCdEtBz
ApsX48H6dalG+KJDVy0m+rA=
=RFnE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
