Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: [HACKERS] Can ICU be used for a database's default sort order? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrey Borodin
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Can ICU be used for a database's default sort order?
Date
Msg-id E17F03D4-F9BA-489C-BAB7-79DF6D45E04F@yandex-team.ru
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Can ICU be used for a database's default sort order?  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Can ICU be used for a database's default sort order?  (Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6@gmail.com>)
Re: [HACKERS] Can ICU be used for a database's default sort order?  (Marius Timmer <marius.timmer@uni-muenster.de>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
Hi!

> 2 окт. 2018 г., в 11:37, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> написал(а):
>
> Please note that the latest patch set does not apply, so this has been
> switched to commit fest 2018-11, waiting on author for a rebase.

PFA rebased version. I've added LDFLAGS_INTERNAL += $(ICU_LIBS) in libpq, but I'm not entirely sure this is correct way
todeal with complaints on ICU functions from libpq linking. 


Best regards, Andrey Borodin.
Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Banck
Date:
Subject: Re: Installation instructions update (pg_ctl)
Next
From: Masahiko Sawada
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Block level parallel vacuum