On Wed Jun 10, 2026 at 2:15 AM -03, Ayush Tiwari wrote:
>> One minor naming observation: the new fdwPrivLists field in
>> ModifyTableState doesn't follow the mt_ prefix convention used by the
>> other re-indexed lists (mt_updateColnosLists, mt_mergeActionLists,
>> mt_mergeJoinConditions). Should we rename it to mt_fdwPrivLists for
>> consistency?
>>
>
> I think yes, it makes sense to rename it.
>
Attached v2 renamed, thanks.
(Also CC Amit on this since he committed cbc127917e0 which I believe
that is when the issue started)
--
Matheus Alcantara
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
