>>The suggested change pares down the "Tip" to more of a brief "Note", which IMHO is a bit
>>terse for that section of the documentation (which has more of a tutorial character),
>>and the contents of the original tip basically still apply for volatile default values
>>anyway.
>>
>>I've attached another suggestion for rewording this which should also make the
>>mechanics of the operation a little clearer.
>Thank you, that better explains it. Looks good to me.
Shouldn't we add that to the current commit fest?
Regards
Daniel
