Re: implemented missing bitSetBit() and bitGetBit() - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Dann Corbit
Subject Re: implemented missing bitSetBit() and bitGetBit()
Date
Msg-id D90A5A6C612A39408103E6ECDD77B8294CE619@voyager.corporate.connx.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to implemented missing bitSetBit() and bitGetBit()  (David Helgason <david@uti.is>)
List pgsql-hackers
Bit sets are remarkably useful functionality.   I suggest putting it
into the core product.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Neil Conway [mailto:neilc@samurai.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2004 11:22 AM
> To: David Helgason
> Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] implemented missing bitSetBit() and bitGetBit()
>
>
> David Helgason <david@uti.is> writes:
> > I needed these, so I went and implemented them myself.
>
> I didn't see any followup to this: do we want to include this
> in the main tree, contrib/, or not at all?
>
> -Neil (who has no opinion on the matter, but just wants to
> make sure this doesn't fall through the cracks)
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of
> broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>               http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Neil Conway
Date:
Subject: Re: implemented missing bitSetBit() and bitGetBit()
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: implemented missing bitSetBit() and bitGetBit()