Re: implemented missing bitSetBit() and bitGetBit() - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Neil Conway
Subject Re: implemented missing bitSetBit() and bitGetBit()
Date
Msg-id 87isim1wgy.fsf@mailbox.samurai.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to implemented missing bitSetBit() and bitGetBit()  (David Helgason <david@uti.is>)
Responses Re: implemented missing bitSetBit() and bitGetBit()  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
David Helgason <david@uti.is> writes:
> I needed these, so I went and implemented them myself.

I didn't see any followup to this: do we want to include this in the
main tree, contrib/, or not at all?

-Neil (who has no opinion on the matter, but just wants to make sure
this doesn't fall through the cracks)



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Joe Conway
Date:
Subject: Re: array surprising behavior
Next
From: "Dann Corbit"
Date:
Subject: Re: implemented missing bitSetBit() and bitGetBit()