Re: Patch for current_schemas to optionally include implicit schemas - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Dave Page
Subject Re: Patch for current_schemas to optionally include implicit schemas
Date
Msg-id D85C66DA59BA044EB96AB9683819CF61015364@dogbert.vale-housing.co.uk
Whole thread Raw
In response to Patch for current_schemas to optionally include implicit schemas  ("Dave Page" <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>)
List pgsql-patches

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tom Lane [mailto:tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us]
> Sent: 09 June 2002 20:46
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: pgsql-patches@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: Patch for current_schemas to optionally include
> implicit schemas
>
>
> "Dave Page" <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk> writes:
> > Attached is the result which seems to work OK here. The existing
> > current_schemas() works as previously, & I have added
> > current_schemas(bool) which will return the full implicit/explicit
> > path if passed true or the explicit path is pass false.
>
> This patch will break the existing current_schemas() function
> AFAICS; the code will be testing a value that it wasn't
> passed, and getting a random result, so it's unclear which
> behavior you'd get.

Ahh, I was unaware of that - too used to VB & C# where booleans default
to false I suppose...

> Since current_schemas() isn't in any released code yet, it's
> not by any means set in stone.  I'd be willing to simply
> change it to take a boolean parameter always.  Comments anyone?

Fine with me.

Regards, Dave.

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Patch for current_schemas to optionally include implicit schemas
Next
From: Joe Conway
Date:
Subject: C&SRF API patch (was Re: [HACKERS] revised sample SRF C function; proposed SRF API)