Re: pg_restore performance on solaris 10/6 - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Thomas Burns
Subject Re: pg_restore performance on solaris 10/6
Date
Msg-id D26FE896-B993-4178-B573-4670D978ED0C@schoolloop.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_restore performance on solaris 10/6  (Vivek Khera <vivek@khera.org>)
List pgsql-general
On Aug 1, 2006, at 8:52 AM, Vivek Khera wrote:

>
> On Jul 31, 2006, at 3:45 PM, Thomas Burns wrote:
>
>> our database literally takes 8 times longer on the x4200 as it
>> does on
>> OS X (the x4200 hardware should be considerably faster -- it has
>> better
>
> for a restore like this, bump up the value of checkpoint_segments
> to some large value (I use 256 -- but I have a dedicated partition
> for the pg_xlog directory which gets big).

will give that a shot

>
> also, the normal tuning of the shared memory settings apply.  how
> much RAM do you have and what kind of disks are you using?

I have 50000 shared buffers and 10000 temp buffers (the machine has
16G ram).   The disks are new/fast SCSI drives

>
>

Thomas E. Burns
Co-Founder/CTO, Schoolloop.com
http://www.schoolloop.com
tombu@schoolloop.com
415.255.7285




pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "Maryellen"
Date:
Subject: Fulltime Opportunities in Silicon Valley!
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: Performance of the listen command