RE: MySQL has transactions - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Willis, Ian (Ento, Canberra)
Subject RE: MySQL has transactions
Date
Msg-id D21A20CD84607E409F314E31F0F68D8A02BF10@cricket-be.ento.csiro.au.
Whole thread Raw
In response to MySQL has transactions  ("David Wall" <d.wall@computer.org>)
Responses RE: MySQL has transactions  (The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org>)
List pgsql-general
speed with tranactions on
row level locking
I though that postgresql had more data type
extensable interface
choice of index types
better performance under load
triggers
to name a few. Has anyone actually benchmarked mySQL with transations
enabled?



-----Original Message-----
From: David Wall [mailto:d.wall@computer.org]
Sent: Wednesday, 24 January 2001 3:30 PM
To: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Subject: [GENERAL] MySQL has transactions


Now that MySQL has transaction support through Berkeley DB lib, and it's
always had way more data types, what are the main advantages postgresql has
over it?  I don't think mysql has subselects and such, but they did add a
master-slave replication feature as well as online reorganization (perhaps
locks tables like vacuum?).

Anybody used both of the current releases who can comment?

Thanks,
David


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: John Frank
Date:
Subject: Out of overflow pages. Out of luck.
Next
From: Steve Leibel
Date:
Subject: Re: MySQL has transactions