>
> On Wed, Aug 07, 2024 at 06:00:53AM +0000, Bertrand Drouvot wrote:
>> + SleepEx((microsec < 500 ? 1 : (microsec + 500) / 1000), FALSE);
>
> I think this deserves a comment.
>
Done
>> +#define INSTR_TIME_ADD_MICROSEC(x,t) \
>> + ((x).ticks += t * NS_PER_US)
>
> I'd add parentheses around "t" to ensure any expressions given as "t" are
> evaluated first.
>
Done
> Also, do we need to worry about overflow here? It looks like the rest of
> instr_time.h is oblivious about overflow, so maybe this is better discussed
> in a separate thread...
>
I agree, this needs to be handled in a different thread.
Please see v7.
Regards,
Sami