Re: 2021-09 Commitfest - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Daniel Gustafsson
Subject Re: 2021-09 Commitfest
Date
Msg-id CEACF53D-F5C9-4EA0-A5B5-0062D9260AB4@yesql.se
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: 2021-09 Commitfest  (Jaime Casanova <jcasanov@systemguards.com.ec>)
Responses Re: 2021-09 Commitfest
Re: 2021-09 Commitfest
List pgsql-hackers
> On 1 Oct 2021, at 19:49, Jaime Casanova <jcasanov@systemguards.com.ec> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 01, 2021 at 01:43:23PM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:

>> Isn't the usual procedure to change their status, move them, and then
>> change it back again? ISTR something like that when I managed a CF.

Correct, if one looks at the activity log for an old entry the pattern of
moving to needs review, then to the next CF, then WoA is clearly visible.

> Really?!

Sadly yes.

> That sounds tedious!

Correct.

> I will do that but we should improve that process.

Correct again.

--
Daniel Gustafsson        https://vmware.com/




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Денис Смирнов
Date:
Subject: Re: PoC Refactor AM analyse API
Next
From: Andrey Borodin
Date:
Subject: Re: parallelizing the archiver