Re: "private" installation of postgres - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Scott Ribe
Subject Re: "private" installation of postgres
Date
Msg-id CC78C800-219B-4C83-8A66-9137F147C00D@killerbytes.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: "private" installation of postgres  ("Joshua J. Kugler" <joshua@eeinternet.com>)
List pgsql-general
On Sep 8, 2010, at 1:39 PM, Joshua J. Kugler wrote:

> If you do a private socket dir, and connect via that, you don't even
> have to listen on a TCP port at all.

Right, but it's hardwired in that the IP port number is used as part of the domain socket name, and according to Tom
alsoused somehow in shared memory segments. 

--
Scott Ribe
scott_ribe@elevated-dev.com
http://www.elevated-dev.com/
(303) 722-0567 voice





pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Sam Nelson
Date:
Subject: Re: Memory Errors
Next
From: zhong ming wu
Date:
Subject: variable name in plpgsql