Re: [PATCH] Use bounded GIN pending-list cleanup in parallel autovacuum - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jingtang Zhang
Subject Re: [PATCH] Use bounded GIN pending-list cleanup in parallel autovacuum
Date
Msg-id CAPsk3_Bc20UPyZUHabaX_XbFHj5riFqj6GRUBiQtJdc-=3edmw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread
In response to Re: [PATCH] Use bounded GIN pending-list cleanup in parallel autovacuum  (Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [PATCH] Use bounded GIN pending-list cleanup in parallel autovacuum
List pgsql-hackers
Hi, Masahiko Sawada and Yuhang.

Thanks for the review! Attached is v3 with the comment updated as
suggested, rebased on current master.

> Having a reliable test at a convenient cost seems challenging to me,
> and doesn't justify its benefit. I think we can push it without a
> test.

I've left out the regression test, as discussed.

---
Best regards,
Jingtang

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Ashutosh Sharma
Date:
Subject: Re: Orphaned Files in PostgreSQL
Next
From: Amit Langote
Date:
Subject: potentially missed pgindent in REL_19_STABLE