Request a Demo
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: [PATCH] Use bounded GIN pending-list cleanup in parallel autovacuum - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Masahiko Sawada
Subject Re: [PATCH] Use bounded GIN pending-list cleanup in parallel autovacuum
Date
Msg-id CAD21AoC1=wEjipdrV=fB06dGD2by0pQMXWrMqbjnvfA4dJd89Q@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread
In response to Re: [PATCH] Use bounded GIN pending-list cleanup in parallel autovacuum  (Jingtang Zhang <mrdrivingduck@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Thu, Sep 24, 2026 at 1:20 AM Jingtang Zhang <mrdrivingduck@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi, Masahiko Sawada and Yuhang.
>
> Thanks for the review! Attached is v3 with the comment updated as
> suggested, rebased on current master.
>
> > Having a reliable test at a convenient cost seems challenging to me,
> > and doesn't justify its benefit. I think we can push it without a
> > test.
>
> I've left out the regression test, as discussed.

Thank you for updating the patch! I've pushed it.

Regards,

--
Masahiko Sawada
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jacob Champion
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Explain what the default output_plugin_libraries do
Next
From: Masahiko Sawada
Date:
Subject: Re: Adding a range check on the sequence index from the publisher.