Re: jsonpath versus NaN - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alexander Korotkov
Subject Re: jsonpath versus NaN
Date
Msg-id CAPpHfdvfK4kK1DuiAm20+U31VUVH=8REg6CVnOAgSZvoNs=RsQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: jsonpath versus NaN  (Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: jsonpath versus NaN  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 4:04 AM Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com> wrote:
> I understand both patches as fixes and propose to backpatch them to 12
> if no objections.

Both patches are pushed.

------
Regards,
Alexander Korotkov



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: David Rowley
Date:
Subject: Re: Default setting for enable_hashagg_disk
Next
From: Zhenghua Lyu
Date:
Subject: Re: distribute_restrictinfo_to_rels if restrictinfo contains volatile functions