Re: jsonpath versus NaN - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: jsonpath versus NaN
Date
Msg-id 2396094.1594489597@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: jsonpath versus NaN  (Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com> writes:
> On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 4:04 AM Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I understand both patches as fixes and propose to backpatch them to 12
>> if no objections.

> Both patches are pushed.

Thanks for taking care of that!

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: "tuple concurrently updated" in pg_restore --jobs
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove Extra palloc Of raw_buf For Binary Format In COPY FROM