On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 12:57 PM, Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com> wrote: > I found that code of gistchoose doesn't follow it's logic. Idea of > gistchoose is that first column penalty is more important than penalty of > second column. If we meet same penalty values of first column then we choose > minimal penalty value of second column among them.
Nice catch. Thanks for the patch, which I have now committed. But since these functions were very short on useful comments, I added some. Hopefully they're even right, but let me know if you think otherwise, or have any ideas for further improvement.
