Re: Locking B-tree leafs immediately in exclusive mode - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alexander Korotkov
Subject Re: Locking B-tree leafs immediately in exclusive mode
Date
Msg-id CAPpHfduUMFYUOeu-bbkZ2dJX36rWTU_tdx6TWNhF+TAgPwPbSQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Locking B-tree leafs immediately in exclusive mode  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 6:32 PM Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 5:43 AM, Alexander Korotkov
> <a.korotkov@postgrespro.ru> wrote:
> > However, that doesn't
> > look like inevitable shortcoming, because we could store heap TID in
> > t_tid of pivot index tuples.
>
> But the offset doesn't have enough space for an entire TID.

Sorry, my bad.  It slipped my mind that we use t_tid.ip_blkid of pivot
tuples to store downlinks :)
So, yes, additional attribute is required to store heap TID in pivot tuple.

Anyway, I'm looking forward seeing your patch posted, if even it would
be not yet perfect shape.


------
Alexander Korotkov
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Rui DeSousa
Date:
Subject: Re: Remove mention in docs that foreign keys on partitioned tables arenot supported
Next
From: Masahiko Sawada
Date:
Subject: Re: [Proposal] Table-level Transparent Data Encryption (TDE) and KeyManagement Service (KMS)