On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 12:09 AM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
On 2017-04-04 00:04:09 +0300, Alexander Korotkov wrote: > > >Thank you! > > >I already sent version of patch after David's reminder. > > >Please find rebased patch in the attachment. > > > > Cool. I think that's still a bit late for v10? > > > > I don't know. ISTM, that I addressed all the issues raised by reviewers. > Also, this patch is pending since late 2013. It would be very nice to > finally get it in...
To me this hasn't gotten even remotely enough performance evaluation.
I'm ready to put my efforts on that.
And I don't think it's fair to characterize it as pending since 2013,
Probably, this duration isn't good characteristic at all.
given it was essentially "waiting on author" for most of that.
What makes you think so? Do you have some statistics? Or is it just random assumption?
