On 2017-04-04 09:22:07 +1200, David Rowley wrote:
> On 4 April 2017 at 08:24, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> > On 2017-04-03 20:59:42 +1200, David Rowley wrote:
> >> Updated patch attached.
> >>
> >> Thanks for reviewing it.
> >
> > Given the time in the release cycle I'm afraid that this it's too late
> > to get this into v10. Does anybody disagree? If not, it should be
> > moved to the next CF.
>
> I strongly disagree. The time in the release cycle is the final
> commitfest. This is when patches are commited to the repository. The
> exception to this is that no large invasive patches should arrive new
> in the final commitfest. This is not one of those.
Right.
> Tom has already mentioned he'd like to look at this.
He also said that it'll be a while, and he hadn't yet by the time of the
original freeze date.
> Please explain your logic for thinking otherwise. Have I somehow
> misunderstood what the 1 week extension means?
Well, we have a lot of pending work, some of that has been pending for
years essentially. And Tom hadn't looked at it yet, and he wasn't at
pgconf.us, so he wasn't actually delayed due to that...
I'm fine with not punting right now, but we need to reduce the number of
patches and focus on stuff that's realistic to get in. There's 4 days
and ~60 open CF entries. Please help whip other patches into shape...
- Andres
