On Sat, Sep 14, 2019 at 10:39 AM Alexander Korotkov
<a.korotkov@postgrespro.ru> wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 14, 2019 at 12:36 AM Alvaro Herrera
> <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> > On 2019-Aug-06, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
> >
> > > Revised patch is attached. Changes to \dA+ command are reverted. It
> > > also contains some minor improvements.
> > >
> > > Second patch looks problematic for me, because it provides index
> > > description alternative to \d+. IMHO, if there is something really
> > > useful to display about index, we should keep it in \d+. So, I
> > > propose to postpone this.
> >
> > Are you saying that we should mark this entire CF entry as Returned with
> > Feedback? Or do you see a subset of your latest 0001 as a commitable
> > patch?
>
> Still hope to commit 0001. Please, don't mark RFC for now.
Sorry, I meant don't mark it RWF for now :)
------
Alexander Korotkov
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company
