On Sat, Sep 14, 2019 at 12:36 AM Alvaro Herrera
<alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> On 2019-Aug-06, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
>
> > Revised patch is attached. Changes to \dA+ command are reverted. It
> > also contains some minor improvements.
> >
> > Second patch looks problematic for me, because it provides index
> > description alternative to \d+. IMHO, if there is something really
> > useful to display about index, we should keep it in \d+. So, I
> > propose to postpone this.
>
> Are you saying that we should mark this entire CF entry as Returned with
> Feedback? Or do you see a subset of your latest 0001 as a commitable
> patch?
Still hope to commit 0001. Please, don't mark RFC for now.
------
Alexander Korotkov
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company
