On Thu, Feb 19, 2026 at 5:30 AM Andreas Karlsson <andreas@proxel.se> wrote:
> On 2/18/26 9:23 PM, Etsuro Fujita wrote:
> > I think the former part of the comment should be: Return *false* if
> > the password_required is defined and false for this user mapping,
> > otherwise *true*.
> I feel the wording of the comment is pretty awkward both before and
> after your correctness fix. I am not a native speaker but shouldn't it
> be something like the below which explains better what is actually going on.
>
> /*
> * Checks the value of password_required, defaults to true
> * if not defined. The mapping has been pre-validated.
> */
I like your wording. I am not a native speaker either, though. This
would be nitpicking, but I think it is better to clearly mention what
the function returns. How about modifying it a bit, like this?
/*
* Check and return the value of password_required, if defined; otherwise,
* return true, which is the default value of it. The mapping has been
* pre-validated.
*/
Anyway, thanks for the comment!
Best regards,
Etsuro Fujita
