Re: Minor improvement to partition_bounds_copy() - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Etsuro Fujita
Subject Re: Minor improvement to partition_bounds_copy()
Date
Msg-id CAPmGK14PGUHF39xw0z2ZiqeEZ=7pBBFAxXc5ionOuL7bmWw2_A@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Minor improvement to partition_bounds_copy()  (Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 10:52 PM Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 09:38:26PM +0900, Amit Langote wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 8:36 PM Etsuro Fujita <etsuro.fujita@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > partition_bounds_copy() sets the hash_part and natts variable in each
> > > iteration of a loop to copy the datums in the datums array, which
> > > would not be efficient.  Attached is small patch for avoiding that.
> >
> > That looks good to me.
>
> Looks good to me too!

Pushed.  Thanks, Amit and Julien!

Best regards,
Etsuro Fujita



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: backend type in log_line_prefix?
Next
From: Ants Aasma
Date:
Subject: Re: Parallel copy