Re: Asynchronous Append on postgres_fdw nodes. - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Etsuro Fujita
Subject Re: Asynchronous Append on postgres_fdw nodes.
Date
Msg-id CAPmGK14DF1=_B6zvqfh1rx1dWHLOTJgVkfr3g50MmcBQyHEjKw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Asynchronous Append on postgres_fdw nodes.  (Andrey Lepikhov <a.lepikhov@postgrespro.ru>)
Responses Defer selection of asynchronous subplans until the executor initialization stage  (Andrey Lepikhov <a.lepikhov@postgrespro.ru>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, May 7, 2021 at 7:35 PM Andrey Lepikhov
<a.lepikhov@postgrespro.ru> wrote:
> On 6/5/21 14:11, Etsuro Fujita wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 3:57 PM Andrey V. Lepikhov
> > <a.lepikhov@postgrespro.ru> wrote:
> >> One more question. Append choose async plans at the stage of the Append
> >> plan creation.
> >> Later, the planner performs some optimizations, such as eliminating
> >> trivial Subquery nodes. So, AsyncAppend is impossible in some
> >> situations, for example:
> >>
> >> (SELECT * FROM f1 WHERE a < 10)
> >>     UNION ALL
> >> (SELECT * FROM f2 WHERE a < 10);

> >> We can choose async
> >> subplans at the beginning of the execution stage.
> >> For a demo, I prepared the patch (see in attachment).
> >> It solves the problem and passes the regression tests.
> >
> > IIUC, another approach to this would be the
> > patch you proposed before [1].  Right?
> Yes. I think, new solution will be better.

Ok, will review.

I think it would be better to start a new thread for this, and add the
patch to the next CF so that it doesn’t get lost.

Best regards,
Etsuro Fujita



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Etsuro Fujita
Date:
Subject: Re: Asynchronous Append on postgres_fdw nodes.
Next
From: Etsuro Fujita
Date:
Subject: Inherited UPDATE/DELETE vs async execution