Re: ERROR: MultiXactId XXXXX has not been created yet -- apparent wraparound - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Ioana Danes
Subject Re: ERROR: MultiXactId XXXXX has not been created yet -- apparent wraparound
Date
Msg-id CAPg0s+4K3pdz4R4rq9nw-SPQio7_69xqCvcw0gPtQ1cab8MKVA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: ERROR: MultiXactId XXXXX has not been created yet -- apparent wraparound  (Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com>)
List pgsql-general


On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 11:40 AM, Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com> wrote:
On 08/15/2016 08:05 AM, Ioana Danes wrote:


On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 10:52 AM, Adrian Klaver
<adrian.klaver@aklaver.com <mailto:adrian.klaver@aklaver.com>> wrote:




        They are not the same servers but they have similar setup.
        Fortunately
        they are qa and development.


    Should have asked previously, are they on the same host machine?

No they are on different physical machines.


    Basically, something is corrupting data, just trying to narrow it
    down to hardware or software. Looking to figure out if the
    problem(s) follow the physical machine or the software the Postgres
    is running on.

I would say software because on the same physical machines we had SLES +
XEN running for years without any kind of corruption.


I would tend to agree, but one cannot discount the effects of age. Could be that the OS switch happened just prior to some age induced failure in hardware.
 
Still, do you have a running Postgres instance or have you tried running a Postgres instance on CentOS that is not in a VM?

Thank you for all your insights, it's been very helpful. I think the best strategy is to start testing each component, changing one component at a time...

I will be back with the result of our tests.

Thanks again for your time and help,
ioana 


--
Adrian Klaver
adrian.klaver@aklaver.com

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreXL
Next
From: Merlin Moncure
Date:
Subject: Re: Any reasons for 'DO' statement not returning result?