Re: Tackling JsonPath support - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Christian Convey
Subject Re: Tackling JsonPath support
Date
Msg-id CAPfS4ZxGfNAf-hUTGp-cNZ1_E0qyYtPr77EVwpOh8=g=y1efLw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Tackling JsonPath support  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 10:37 PM, Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> wrote:


2016-11-29 7:34 GMT+01:00 Christian Convey <christian.convey@gmail.com>:
On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 9:28 PM, Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> wrote:
​​
We now support XPath function - JSONPath is similar to XPath -
​​
it is better for user, because have to learn only one language.

I'm not sure I understand.

Are you suggesting that we use XPath, not JSONPath, as our language for json-path expressions?

surely not.

follow ANSI/SQL :)

I see.  Then I'm afraid I still don't understand what you're main point was when you wrote:

We now support XPath function - JSONPath is similar to XPath - 
​​
it is better for user, because have to learn only one language.

- C

 
 

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Stephen Frost
Date:
Subject: Re: Exclude pg_largeobject form pg_dump
Next
From: Petr Jelinek
Date:
Subject: Re: Tackling JsonPath support