Re: Tackling JsonPath support - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Pavel Stehule
Subject Re: Tackling JsonPath support
Date
Msg-id CAFj8pRC8FFX9=+yi_im8bBJP0GJrv92hSuoFUH0nft62QLk0oQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Tackling JsonPath support  (Christian Convey <christian.convey@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Tackling JsonPath support  (Christian Convey <christian.convey@gmail.com>)
Re: Tackling JsonPath support  (Petr Jelinek <petr@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers


2016-11-29 7:34 GMT+01:00 Christian Convey <christian.convey@gmail.com>:
On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 9:28 PM, Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> wrote:
We now support XPath function - JSONPath is similar to XPath - it is better for user, because have to learn only one language.

I'm not sure I understand.

Are you suggesting that we use XPath, not JSONPath, as our language for json-path expressions?

surely not.

follow ANSI/SQL :)

Pavel
 

​- C

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Christian Convey
Date:
Subject: Re: Tackling JsonPath support
Next
From: Vladimir Borodin
Date:
Subject: Re: GIN non-intrusive vacuum of posting tree