Re: htup header reorganization breaks many extension modules - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Hitoshi Harada
Subject Re: htup header reorganization breaks many extension modules
Date
Msg-id CAP7Qgm=8-7JWb-HfLZzXwzdJGL627Nram6-JQOk7D25q4_HeDw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to htup header reorganization breaks many extension modules  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Responses Re: htup header reorganization breaks many extension modules  ("Albe Laurenz" <laurenz.albe@wien.gv.at>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 5:30 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote:
> I haven't followed the details of the htup header reorganization, but I
> have noticed that a number of external extension modules will be broken
> because of the move of GETSTRUCT() and to a lesser extent
> heap_getattr().  Of course some #ifdefs can fix that, but it seems
> annoying to make everyone do that.  Maybe this could be reconsidered to
> reduce the impact on other projects.
>

But it's only add #include "access/htup_details.h"?  I'd not argue
it's harmful unless I missed your point.

Thanks,
-- 
Hitoshi Harada



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: _FORTIFY_SOURCE by default?
Next
From: Daymel Bonne Solís
Date:
Subject: system_information.triggers & truncate triggers