Re: explain plans for foreign servers - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From dinesh salve
Subject Re: explain plans for foreign servers
Date
Msg-id CAP+B4TDxE3gbrixL9qR9F+CK_N_N0-HmXSL55QXVZNAorRHSHQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: explain plans for foreign servers  (Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Hi Sami,
Thanks for the feedback. I have refactored the commit on the latest version of PG and added a few more tests. To simplify the roll out of this feature, I decided to work on analyze=false use case first. Please find the attached patch for the same.

Regards,
Dinesh

On Thu, Mar 6, 2025 at 4:54 AM Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com> wrote:
On Wed, 2025-03-05 at 14:12 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> I'm afraid not.  That pretty fundamentally breaks the wire protocol,
> I think.

The extended protocol docs say: "The possible responses to Execute are
the same as those described above for queries issued via simple query
protocol, except that Execute doesn't cause ReadyForQuery or
RowDescription to be issued."

Each result set needs a RowDescription, so I think you're right that it
breaks the extended protocol. I missed that the first time.

Regards,
        Jeff Davis



--

Regards,
Dinesh Salve
Cell:- 91 8125898845
Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: 高增琦
Date:
Subject: Re: Compile error on the aarch64 platform: Missing asm/hwcap.h
Next
From: Andrew Kim
Date:
Subject: Re: Proposal for enabling auto-vectorization for checksum calculations