On Mon, Apr 6, 2026 at 7:28 AM Sami Imseih <samimseih@gmail.com> wrote:
> > +1. I think it might be better to mention this in the documentation to
> > make the behavior explicit. What do you think about stating that an
> > anti-wraparound autovacuum does not perform an ANALYZE, like in the
> > attached patch?
>
> +1 to the additional documentation.
>
> a small nit: We can just say "skipped" and not "still skipped".
Thanks, I've fixed it.
--
Best regards,
Shinya Kato
NTT OSS Center